 |
Over
the course of years, our team
has dealt with a wide variety of cases involving brain injury.
We know the way the law works, and we take the field with the
clear intention to win. When faced with the loss of large sums
of money, you can expect insurance companies and organizations
to fight back. Steinbrecher & Associates has a near perfect
record of success in fighting these defense teams. Justice is
your right, and it is what we serve.
Here
are two recent cases that underscore our competence in the area
of burn injury; Serrano/Zaldana
v. Thoro-Matic and Williams
v. GAF Corp.
In
the first case, Serrano/Zaldana v. Thoro-Matic our clients,
Hispanic laborers, were told by their employer to remove tile
glue from a cement floor. They used a chemical to loosen the glue.
The final step was the use of a Thoro-Matic floor machine that
warned in English only that the machine sparked and could cause
an explosion if used with flammable chemicals. Our clients could
not read or understand the yellow warning label on the machine.
They poured flammable Acetone on the floor of a small room and
then turned the Thoro-Matic machine on. The machine caused the
vapors to explode, burning both of them. A product liability lawsuit
was brought against the manufacturer for failing to provide universal
warning, such as a pictogram, to warn of the risk of explosion
from sparking. The mechanical start switches, which sparked, should
have been replaced with solid-state switches that did not spark.
The lawsuit was settled before trial for the policy limits of
$2,000,000 from the machine manufacturer and $100,000
from the retail store.
In
the second case, Williams v. GAF Corp. Oscar
Williams drove an asphalt-filled tanker truck. He pulled into
GAF's facility to offload hot asphalt. He climbed up on the truck
in the rain to crack the dome lid so that the tanker could unload
easily. Suddenly there was a huge explosion of hot asphalt shooting
out of the top of the tanker truck dome showering Oscar, causing
severe burn injuries. A year after the accident Oscar died from
lung cancer. GAF claimed that the lung cancer was caused by a
long history of smoking. Plaintiff proved through various experts
that the lung cancer was probably the result of inhalation and
absorption of hot asphalt which contained toxic chemicals. The
case settled prior to trial for $1,150,000.
We
understand you may have many questions about how cases proceed
to trial, and what demands might be placed on you should you yourself
have to appear in court. Contact us
and we can help inform you on these matters or click
here to check out more of our cases and to see what we have
done for others in your situation. We know you'll be impressed.
Thank you.
|
 |